A. The summary of the facts charged is as follows. The Defendant, as N.N. On December 11, 2012, before the 18th presidential election, reported by the National Intelligence Service employees of the National Intelligence Service that started the investigation on the issue of cyber political participation and election opening suspicions (hereinafter referred to as the “National Assembly Fixed Number of Cases”), was in charge of digital evidence analysis on December 13, 2012 at the T Police Station affiliated with the Seoul Seoul Central Police Agency, where the said case was under investigation, including Q Nogles, which requested analysis as an investigation by the Seoul National Police Agency cyber Investigation Agency. On December 13, 2012, the Defendant did not inform the Seoul National Police Agency of its digital evidence analysis, including Q Nogles, that if the results of evidence analysis were delivered to the T Police Agency and continued the investigation, it would in itself serve as favorable or unfavorable to a specific candidate. On the premise that it did not inform the Seoul National Police Agency of the results of the analysis of the NIS’s digital evidence analysis and the results of the analysis of the NIS’s digital evidence.