조합설립인가취소
1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the Plaintiff A’s claim shall be dismissed.
2. The plaintiff B and C's claims are all dismissed.
3...
1. Details of the disposition;
A. As to the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”), Plaintiff A was entitled to 1/100 of the co-ownership share in the above apartment E on November 10, 2017; Plaintiff B was entitled to Divided ownership in the above apartment E on June 1, 1993; Plaintiff C acquired 1/2 of the co-ownership share in the above apartment G on September 17, 2007; and the Intervenor joining the Intervenor (hereinafter “the Intervenor”) acquired 1/2 of the above apartment G on September 17, 2007 in order to promote the housing reconstruction improvement project of the instant apartment (hereinafter “the instant apartment”); and the Intervenor’s Intervenor is a reconstruction maintenance project association established on September 12, 2017 with the authorization of the establishment of the association from the Defendant on August 31, 2017.
B. On June 3, 2017, the Committee for Promotion of Establishment of the D Apartment Housing Reconstruction Project Association (hereinafter “instant Promotion Committee”) attended 412 of its members (including 242 written resolution), among 514 members, and resolved to approve the articles of association of the association by holding an inaugural general meeting (hereinafter “instant inaugural general meeting”); the cases of approval of election management regulations (Article 1); the cases of succession to the duties of the Promotion Committee (Article 2); the cases of election management succession (Article 4); the cases of election of union executives (Article 6); and the cases of election of union representatives (Article 7).
C. Based on the contents of the resolution at the inaugural general meeting of this case, the instant promotion committee applied for authorization to establish an association for the Defendant, and the Defendant issued a disposition to authorize the establishment of the Intervenor pursuant to Article 16 of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017; hereinafter “former Act”) on August 31, 2017.
(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.
On the other hand, Yongsan-gu Seoul apartment located in the apartment of this case was designated as an overheated speculation district under Article 63 (1) of the Housing Act on August 2, 2017.
[Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, and 8 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and Eul.