아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)등
The sentence against the accused shall be determined by one year and six months of imprisonment.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Criminal facts
1. On April 23, 2017, from around 13:30 to April 23:50, 2017, the Defendant came to know of the fact that he/she sent E (V, 13 years of age) from the Defendant’s residence in the Gu and Sinsi Stack 501, and from the Defendant’s residence in the Gu and Sinsi Stack 501, he/she came to know of the fact that he/she got out of E (V, 13 years of age) through D, such as giving payment of the above E at the above residence, and provided accommodation for eight to nine occasions in return, thereby purchasing child and juvenile sex.
2. A person in violation of the Act on the Protection and Support of Missing Children, Etc. may not report the missing children, etc. to the head of the police office without justifiable grounds, and the Defendant provided protection at will without reporting to the head of the police office without justifiable grounds, even though he/she knows that the missing children, etc. were released from their custody after leaving the police office at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. Copy of the police statement made to E;
1. A report on internal investigation (a written request, etc. for provision of communication data), investigation report (a written request, 3 copies of the E), / [a defendant asserts that the defendant only has sexual intercourse in the family court and does not have sexual intercourse in return for the provision of accommodation (the defendant also stated in this court that the defendant was aware of the whole facts charged, but does not have sexual intercourse with the intention of sexual intercourse from the beginning). However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above are as follows: (a) The defendant knew of the fact that the defendant did not have a place where he had a sexual intercourse in the family court, and at the time of the police investigation, it is appropriate to have access to the defendant's house with the intention of providing accommodation and having sexual intercourse in return for providing accommodation.
I will answer the question "..........."