1. On September 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a CK3 vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 2 km from the infinite road located in the horizontal line to the infinite road located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, from September 14, 2017, around 13:50.

2. On October 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a Damp Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type 20 LH26, as the Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-type Do-

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment 1] Facts 1, 2017 Highest 7050]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The register of teas and driver's licenses (the facts set forth in the judgment, the order of 2018, the order of 94);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the register of tea and driver's licenses;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. The following circumstances are favorable to the defendant for reasons for sentencing in the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, which are aggravated for concurrent crimes:

The defendant is deeply divided and reflected in each of the crimes in this case.

The crime No. 1 of the judgment did not cause any personal and material damage.

The defendant disposed of the vehicle operated by the defendant.

The defendant has no previous convictions of imprisonment.

The defendant is in the position of the defendant to support his mother, and the defendant's wife is seeking the defendant's wife.

Circumstances unfavorable to the defendant are as follows:

The criminal facts No. 1 committed in the judgment of the defendant, and committed the second crime of the second crime in the judgment after one month.

The Defendant caused a contact accident in the course of committing the crime No. 2 in the judgment of the lower court (the Defendant seems to have been drinking at that time). The Defendant is punished by a fine by driving around around 2014 and 2016, respectively.