2. The Defendant’s crime of this case is an assault against a police officer in uniform, and the nature of the offense is not weak.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s criminal act from the time when he was investigated by the police, and committed the crime against the victimized police officer; (b) the victimized police officer was the Defendant’s wife; (c) the degree of assault on the instant crime appears to be relatively minor; and (d) the Defendant did not have any specific penalty power; and (c) the sentencing conditions such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, etc., the sentence of

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.