However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 26, 2014, at around 04:35, the Defendant received 112 reports that he does not get a guest on the front side of the “E precious metal” located in Seongbuk-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and requested that he return home after having the Defendant calculate a taxi fee, the Defendant set off the 112 patrol front of the 112 patrol, and took a bath to the above police officer, “I am out “I kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn knn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officers related to crime prevention, suppression, and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement of G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-6 months to 1-6 months), and no person [special person] [decision of sentence] State’s legal order and order to eradicate the light of public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish crimes of obstruction of official duties.

However, the sentencing factors such as the defendant's age, environment, character and conduct, and the method of committing the crime of this case shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that the defendant has no criminal history exceeding the fine, the defendant acknowledges the crime of this case and reflects his mistake.