A. On February 26, 2010, the Plaintiff and Defendant A entered into an insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with Nonparty D, designating a beneficiary as the Defendants, who are legal successors, as indicated in the [Attachment List No. 2].

B. On October 26, 2010, Defendant A and D drafted “the obligation to inform the entire contract” of the instant insurance contract, and indicated “V” in the column of “no” as to the question whether the following disease (including high blood pressure) was diagnosed by a doctor through a diagnosis and examination, or as a result, treatment, medication (including medication), hospitalization, surgery, and close inspection was conducted.

C. The above "the obligation to notify prior to the contract" states that "if any question is not true or is falsely notified, the purchase of insurance may be refused, and in particular, if the content falls under the "Important Matters", regardless of the intention of the policyholder or the insured, the contract may be terminated pursuant to the "the effect of the violation of the obligation to notify prior to the contract" under the insurance terms and conditions, and the insurance terms and conditions of the instant insurance contract provide for the following provisions in relation to the duty to notify prior to the contract:

In Sub-Section 4, the contractor, the insured (person subject to insurance), or their agents are aware of the fact that they are asked questions at the time of subscription (including health certificates if they undergo health examinations), such as the contractor's duty to inform the contractor before the contract, and they are like the Commercial Act's duty to inform the contractor before the contract.

28. (Effect of Violation of the duty to notify)

1. The Company (Plaintiff) may terminate this Agreement, regardless of the occurrence of damages, in the following cases:

(1) A contractor, a contractor.