2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

On September 7, 2016, at least 01:26, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender from E in the circumstances belonging to the D District at the Busan City Police Station D District, where he was dispatched after receiving a 112 report that male assaults female on the road in front of the Ccafeteria located in the Busan Sindong-gu, Busan, and the Defendant went to the above E by carrying out work clothes with the hand, stating that “We are subject to this son’s name.” In other words, the Defendant again turned to the above E’s entry skill with the hand, etc., while “I ice few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that even if a person has been sentenced one time to a fine for the same kind of crime for the sentencing reason of the provisional payment order, he/she again commits the instant crime; the offender is at the disadvantage of him/her during the period of suspension of execution; the period of suspension of execution due to the same crime is not the period of suspension of execution; the Defendant is against himself/herself; the Defendant is against him/her; the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment