At around 00:10 on September 10, 2016, the Defendant was punished for the said C and Si expenses as a detailed problem about the Defendant’s gathering of the taxi on the roads of the Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si. Around 00:10 on September 10, 201, the Defendant heard the Defendant’s chest part of the said E’s chest by voiceing the police officer E belonging to the Gwangju Police Station D District, who was called “I would like to be frightly and return home,” who was called “I would have been frightly and naturally.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. A fine of 1.5 million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one hundred thousand won per day converted);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant's liability for sentencing is not less than the standard for sentencing. However, considering all the circumstances, including the defendant's age, character, family, family, home environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant is a young person of 22 years of age who has no previous conviction, the defendant's minor disability, the defendant seems to have been unable to properly distinguish his intention by drinking at the time of the case, the degree and method of assault against the police officer is not serious, and the defendant's serious behavior is obvious, such as the defendant's age, character, family relation, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the decision as above is rendered.