A. The punishment (two million won of a fine) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The instant crime was committed on the part of the Defendant, and thus, requires strict punishment. The instant crime was committed on the part of the Defendant, and the actual occurrence of the Plaintiff’s singishing fraud, etc. are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendant was living without other criminal records; and (c) the Defendant appears to have never been actually acquired by the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of the instant crime; and (c) all of the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, including the circumstances before and after the instant crime, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct; and (d) the motive and means of the instant crime, etc.,

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is groundless, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.