해고무효확인
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the entries in Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 2, and 10 and the purport of all pleadings:
The defendant is a company with the objective of information and communication business and new media business, and the plaintiff is a person who entered the defendant company on February 17, 1992 and worked at the MFB1 Center in the Seoul metropolitan area from July 2009.
B. On January 2, 2013, the head of the ethical management office of the Defendant’s dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff determined that there was a misconduct against the Plaintiff in the course of audit and inspection against the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendant’s personnel committee held on January 10, 2013 (hereinafter “instant disciplinary cause”) decided to dismiss the Plaintiff on January 21, 2013 (hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”).
[The instant Disciplinary Reason] ① purchased a total of KRW 6,390,000 in securities for the purpose of managing and increasing sales of SB customers from around 2010 to July 201; however, it was private use of KRW 3,40,000 among these securities; ② from around 2010 to November 2012, 6,000 in cash was decided to disburse a total of KRW 7,170,000 in cash for its management customer marketing use; ③ around 2011, he/she used a 1,000 won for cosmetics purchased from B branch office as the captain’s goods (1.20,000 won). ④ A company’s family’s personal information was perused for a total of four times regardless of its own duties to peruse customer information in the business computer; and the number of its cell phone was perused in the ICIC case.