However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

[2015 Highest 3021] The Defendant is a person who has served as C’s president from January 24, 2014 to March 18, 2015.

The Defendant abused the fact that the special supply of the disabled is much higher than that of the general supply of the apartment, with the intention or ability to be supplied with the actual apartment, and with respect to the disabled who did not have the intention or ability to be supplied with the apartment, the Defendant used the special supply qualification and name of the apartment to obtain the profits from the resale.

On June 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the C office located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu; (b) provided that, if the apartment sales right is awarded to the affiliated member E, the Defendant would pay the reward; and (c) provided that the said E would make a special supply of the F main apartment constructed in the Seoul-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, to make an offer for the special supply of the said apartment under the name of the said E; and (d) supplied the said apartment under the name of the said E by fraudulent or other illegal means.

[2015 Highest 3903] Occupational embezzlement Defendant served as the chairperson of the victim C in the Dong-gu, Gwangju from November 2012 to December 2014, and has been engaged in the welfare and operation of offices for disabled persons.

Around May 9, 2013, the Defendant received a subsidy of KRW 2 million from the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office in the name of the said victim’s Gwangju Bank account (H) and kept in business for the victim. On May 16, 2013, the Defendant transferred the amount of KRW 2 million to the account of the I medical machine as if he purchased 40 light light light light light, which is protective equipment for disabled persons, from the I medical machine to the account of the I medical machine. The Defendant returned the subsidy in cash again and consumed it for personal purposes such as living expenses around that time.

As a result, the defendant embezzled the property of the victim who was in custody on duty.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 3021]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding E;

1. Each internal investigation report and each investigation report;

1. A copy of a post office passbook, and