beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.21 2016나2037103

해고무효확인 등

Text

1. Each appeal filed by the Plaintiff and Defendant B is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case are as follows: "37 through 43" following the 7th 7th 1st 7th 7th 7th 2th 2th 2th 2th 17th 2th 2nd 37th 9th 9th 9th 9th 2nd 3th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 17th 8th 17th 17th 2th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 300, "the defendant corporation did not have any additional evidence as to "the defendant corporation's business performance" or "the defendant corporation's business performance evaluation" without any additional evidence as to "the defendant corporation's business performance evaluation" or "the defendant corporation's business performance evaluation" or "the defendant corporation's business performance evaluation" (the defendant corporation's business performance evaluation of "the defendant corporation's business performance evaluation of the defendant corporation's own own own own business performance evaluation.").

2. Additional determination

A. Even if Defendant B’s assertion agreed to pay to the Plaintiff a performance bonus equivalent to half of 30% of the net profit, Defendant B’s assertion that there was no net profit in 2012, and that there was no net profit in 2012, and that there was a mistake that there was a net profit, and responded to the Plaintiff’s demand for payment of the performance bonus. As such, Defendant B’s consent to the demand for payment of the performance bonus

Therefore, the Plaintiff paid 6,00,000 won to Defendant B following the cancellation.