A. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Although there are disadvantageous circumstances such as the fact that the defendant has been punished several times due to the same kind of violent crime, on the other hand, the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the fact that the defendant was agreed with the victims, etc. In addition, taking into account the circumstances of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., and the application of the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, it is not deemed that the sentence of the court below is too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, the defendant and the prosecutor's assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.