The defendant is a person who is engaged in sales intermediary business such as the former and the latter.

On June 9, 2016, at D's office located in the window C of Changwon-si around July 9, 2016, the Defendant sold to D's representative victim E one (HBR-15S) a pre-produced car (HBR-15S) by the KBR-1.

“.......”

However, the defendant did not have been delegated to receive the sales proceeds of the previous car in lieu of the previous car in question from the Hansung Hysung Pax, and even if he received the sales proceeds of the previous car in exchange for the damage, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver them to the Han Hysung Pax.

Nevertheless, the defendant was delegated to receive the sales proceeds of the previous car by the Han-dong Lastex, and the defendant deceivings the victim as if it was delivered to the Han-dong Lastex, and received 20,350,000 won from the damaged party to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the defendant under the name of the sales proceeds of the previous car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) (a) of the Criminal Act that provides for the applicable sentencing for the crime: The sentencing of less than 100 million won based on the classification of types of punishment is less than 100 million won, or the sentencing of special sentencing is less than one year and six months from June to June 1, and two years and six: The recommended sentencing of no relevant person: The sentencing of general sentencing factors (use of personal trust) in the basic area (from June to June 1): the sentencing of one year: The sentence of imprisonment for a year: The grounds for aggravating damage recovery, etc.; the confession, elementary offender, dependent (child, male 1 female 1), etc.;