2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the Defendants’ acknowledgement of the instant crime and reflection thereof.

However, Defendant A has been punished for the same crime, and Defendant B committed the crime of this case without being aware of it during the period of repeated crime due to the crime. The crime of this case was committed by the Defendants without being aware of it during the period of repeated crime. The crime of this case was committed by taking advantage of the false lease contract, employment certificate, etc. by taking advantage of the fact that the financial institution entrusted with the business related to the loan of the entire house loan for workers only conducts a formal examination, thereby acquiring considerable money from the victims, which is a financial institution, under the name of the entire house loan fund, and the nature of the crime is very poor, the damage has not been recovered, and other various sentencing conditions such as the defendants' age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, degree of damage, and circumstances after the crime are considered, it cannot be said that the

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.