The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Defendant

A is the representative operating the "G kindergarten" and the "G child care center" in the "G kindergarten" in the "G kindergarten of Gangwon-gu, and the defendant B is the head of the "G child care center" and the defendant C is the office worker in charge of accounting affairs of the G child care center, and the defendants are operating the child care center by sharing their roles as the general representative of the child care center, the head of the kindergarten, and the office worker, and the defendants are aware of the fact that the subsidies such as child care fees and various allowances are paid in accordance

However, despite the fact that anyone who operates a childcare center or engages in a related business is not granted a subsidy by fraud or other improper means, the Defendants were unable to operate the childcare center due to financial deficiencies, and the Defendants were falsely registered as a childcare teacher who actually worked for the childcare center, and subsequently recruited to receive the subsidy by falsely applying for the childcare fees and various allowances paid to the childcare teacher who actually worked for the childcare center.

1. Defendant B, who is in charge of the administrative affairs of “G child care center” (G child care teacher H), using a computer in the office of the above child care center on August 2009. On or after the end of June 2009, Defendant B, who was in charge of the administrative affairs of the above child care center, applied for the basic infant care fee for July 1, 200 by organizing a separate group of infant care teachers, H, infant care center I (year 1), J (1 year old), K (1 year old), M (1 year old), etc., and received the basic infant care fee for each infant from July 1, 201 to April 12, 2010 as indicated in the attached Table I, such as receiving a total of KRW 169,00,000 for each infant’s deposit account used in “G child care center”, and received the basic infant care fee of KRW 50,005,000 from that date to April 15, 2010.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to receive subsidies by false means.

2. The treatment improvement cost (H).