However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who operates the ‘C party room' in the Chungcheong-gun B.

No one shall engage in speculative activities as a business by using slot machines or speculative gaming machines, in addition to the speculative business.

Nevertheless, from April 2, 2013 to April 22:15, 2013, the Defendant installed two studio game equipment, which is a speculative machine, within the above billiard, and operated a speculative act in such a way as to provide 1,000 won to many and unspecified customers with points of 50 points, and to divide the starting servers, and to divide them, and pay them in cash by converting the 50 points acquired into 1,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Crimes under Relevant Provisions and Special Cases concerning the Speculative Acts, etc. concerning the Selection of Punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act: The defendant has committed the instant crime again even though he had the same criminal records three times, and the speculative business is a crime detrimental to the formation of a sound society: There is no criminal record exceeding the fine imposed on the defendant; considering the number of game machines installed by the defendant, the period of business, and other circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing recorded in the records, such as the age, character and conduct, occupation and family environment of the defendant;