1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the Defendant’s ground of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of fraud as to the victim D among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower

2. On the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting him/her of the facts charged in the instant case and acquitted him/her on the ground that there was no proof of the relevant crime.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.