And the testimony of the defendant is different from objective facts.

Even if the defendant's question is wrong, it is too unreasonable that the defendant's wrong understanding of the purpose of questioning the prosecutor and the lawyer.2) The sentence of the court below's unfair sentencing (the penalty amount of five million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination 1) According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the following circumstances are acknowledged.

① Around 03:30 on February 14, 2008, D used violence with employees before the entrance of the FNE (hereinafter “instant gym clubs”), in order to take retaliation against employees, D contacted the members of the FN-gu gym clubs he/she belongs to and joined the instant gym clubs, and was charged as charges of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the organization and activities of organizations, etc.) that force employees of the lower gym clubs and inflicted bodily injury on V.

② As to the relevant facts charged, D denied that the said facts charged was used by the employees before the entrance of the instant niverse club, and that there was no assault against the employees.

③ On the contrary, in the relevant case, I and W, who is the manager of the instant age club, was found to have been at the time of I’s scam with regard to the issue of access to the instant age club, and I stated that I had the face of the person at the time of his/her face, and that I started fighting between D, H, and G (see, e.g., the investigation record 969 pages). And D’s work was conducted.

H At the time G arrives first in the instant age club and sets off with employees and city expenses.