Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

On October 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny at the Gwangju District Court on November 7, 2015 and completed the execution of the said punishment on November 6, 2015.

On May 11, 2016, the Defendant, at around 03:30 on May 11, 2016, destroyed the locker system of the coffee set up by the victim E on the road in front of the “Dus” located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, by extracting the locker system of the coffee set up by the victim E, and then removed approximately KRW 80,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

They go back.

In addition, from that to May 27, 2016, the Defendant habitually committed an attempted theft or a theft with cash equivalent to KRW 2.80,000,000, which is the victims, at least seven times in total, from that time, from that time to May 27, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made to the defendant in each protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of the police;

1. Each description of the statement of F, E, G, H, I, and J;

1. Each entry into the records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each image of each photograph;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes in which inquiries, such as criminal history, reports on unwritten previous convictions and results of confirmation, and the current status of personal expropriation;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act; Articles 332, 329, and 342 of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act (hereinafter “Confiscation”) has a record of having been sentenced to a punishment of one year and six months for habitual larceny, and the same method has been committed during the period of repeated crime.

However, the property acquired by the defendant as a crime is less than 2.80,000 won.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.