사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
The defendant shall obtain money from the applicant F to the applicant F, 300,000 won, and the applicant for compensation.
Punishment of the crime
On April 13, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud in the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court, and two years of suspended execution on the same day. The judgment becomes final and conclusive and is still under suspended execution.
On April 25, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “a mobile phone is sold” by accessing the “hromarket,” which is a used goods transaction site, at a closed place,” and that “a mobile phone is delivered to the victim K who reported and contacted this letter.” If the Defendant wired KRW 500,000 of the mobile phone price to the victim K, he/she will deliver the gallon 8 mobile phone galthot to the victim K who sent KRW 50,000.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, since the defendant did not have a mobile phone sales, even if he receives the mobile phone price from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to deliver the mobile phone.
The Defendant received KRW 500,000,00 from the victim’s bank account (L) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim, and received KRW 13,740,000 from the victims, from that time until July 4, 2018, in total, 43 times, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Form (1).
Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.
On May 11, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “a mobile phone is sold” by accessing a used goods transaction site, a used goods transaction site, to “a used country,” and that “a mobile phone is sold” is delivered to the victim M who reported and contacted this letter to the victim M who sent KRW 270,000 in the face of transfer of KRW 270,000.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, since the defendant did not have a mobile phone sales, even if he receives the mobile phone price from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to deliver the mobile phone.
The Defendant received 270,000 won from the victim's bank account (N) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim, as the mobile phone price, from the time on July 22, 2018.