2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff Company A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to B cab (hereinafter “Defendant taxi”).

B. On July 30, 2013, around 08:50, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the state of alcohol 0.115% of blood alcohol content, and the Plaintiff’s driver was driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle on the north bank of the Jam-gu Intersection 4 lanes in front of the 624 Jam-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul.

Meanwhile, while the driver of the Defendant taxi stops on the right side of the above four-lane while driving the Defendant taxi, and the driver of the Defendant taxi opened the door of the driver’s seat of the Defendant taxi. In this case, there was an accident that conflicts between the two-lane of the Plaintiff vehicle driving along four-lanes and the driver’s seat of the Defendant taxi.

(hereinafter referred to as "the accident of this case". C. The accident of this case results in serious injury to the driver of defendant taxi.

By December 2, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,650,440 in total to the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle as damages for the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4, or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged as being added to the purport of the entire arguments, as to the ratio of negligence between the plaintiff vehicle and the defendant taxi, are determined, namely, that the defendant taxi stops on the right side of the four-lane road during the operation of the vehicle, the width of the four-lane road at that time is about 3.9m, and the width of the side of the road is about 1.8m (No. (No. (1)), and when the defendant taxi stops on the side, it seems that when the defendant taxi stops on the side, the left side of the taxi was extending to the boundary line of the four-lane road connected to the road, and under the above circumstances, the driver of the defendant taxi would have opened the driver's seat.