[Criminal Records] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on September 2016 by the Seoul Northern District Court on September 9, 2016 for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on September 20, 2016, and is still under the suspended sentence.

[2] On February 4, 2017, on the road in front of Mapo-gu Seoul, Seoul, and on the ground that Defendant B met with the victim G (24 years), Defendant A was in a trial with both hands and the victim’s face and body, and Defendant B was also in combination with the victim’s face and body, and Defendant B continued to attract the victim’s face and body to the head of drinking and swaying along with the victim’s body, and continued to attract the victim’s face and body to the head of the Gu near the said road.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as an internal diagnosis and injury that require approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to G;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, application of investigation reports (Defendant B's criminal history decisions, etc.)-related statutes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 2(2)3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc., and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and Article 2(1)3 of the Act on the Punishment of Punishment of Violences, etc., were acknowledged. However, even though the Defendants were dead by a large run of the paths, they were making efforts from an investigative agency to make a serious effort to recover damage from damage, even though they were not economically difficult circumstances, even if they were not to suffer injury due to a joint victim’s paralysis, and even if they were not economically difficult circumstances.

Unless there are circumstances to see, the victim received a considerable mental impulse in the instant case.

The appeal is the case of the defendant B.