The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

1. As to the ground of appeal No. 1, the lower court, based on its stated reasoning, determined that it is difficult to recognize that the assignment of claims of this case was performed mainly at the night.

In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors of violating the rules of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or

2. As to the grounds of appeal Nos. 2 and 3, the lower court, based on its stated reasoning, determined that the instant lease agreement was not modified by the instant contract No. 2, and that the content of the instant quasi-agreement was invalidated by the conclusion of the instant lease agreement.

In light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the quasi-agreement, the lease agreement, and the validity of the

3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.