물품대금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Plaintiff, which is the cause of the claim, concluded a household supply contract with the Defendant and supplied the household by November 5, 2014. Since the total household amount supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendant is KRW 39,50,000, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 39,50,000 and delay damages.
2. According to the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 of the judgment, the Plaintiff indicated the other party who supplied the household as “C warden” while supplying the household equivalent to KRW 39,50,000,00, and the demand for payment of the price against “C warden.” The evidence alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the other party who entered into a contract for the supply of the household is the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to support the fact that the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the supply of the household with
Therefore, the claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.