beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.08.10 2015고단5224

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are those who were married in a marital relationship from April 20, 2006 to January 30, 2007, and from January 20, 201 to September 23, 2013. They live together from around 1999 to September 20, 201, and they raise E and F and G, who are children of the Defendants and E born between Defendant A and Jeonnam.

피고인들은 의료보호 제 1 종 수급자들 로서 생활 형편이 어려움에도 불구하고, 병원에 입원을 한 후 입원 일당 등 고액의 보험금을 수령하여 생계비로 사용할 목적으로 2004. 6. 3. 경 주식회사 LIG 손해보험에서 판매하는 ‘( 무) 꼬꼬마 자녀 상해 (L3.10)’ 보험에 가입한 것을 비롯하여, 그때부터 2013. 5. 8. 경까지 피고인들 및 E, F, G을 피보험자로 하여 입원할 경우 입원 일 상당의 입원 일당이 지급되는 보험계약을 다수 체결하였다.

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant committed the same year from August 27, 2014 for the purpose of receiving a daily hospitalization allowance even though the symptoms of Defendant F are insignificant and thus there was no need for hospitalized treatment.

9. By February, the same year was hospitalized in the Gwangju veterans hospital located in the Gwangju District in the 887-1 of the Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju District, under the name of "divology and disguised salt presumed to be infected as source" and then the said F was admitted to the said veterans hospital.

9. 6. From around September 6, 2004, as if the victim AI was hospitalized properly for the treatment of disease, the victim's claim for payment of insurance money was filed, and around September 6, 2004, the victim's life compensation was paid KRW 80,000 in the name of the defendant with the No.C. (H) account number (H) in the name of the defendant and the staff in charge, and the hospitalization was not necessary until April 16, 2013. From that time, there was no need for hospitalization from the time to April 16, 2013, and the symptoms of the patient who can receive hospital treatment need to be accompanied by the defendant and the defendant's children E, F, and G are repeatedly hospitalized in the same hospital, and even if the hospitalization is required, the victim's life compensation was hospitalized in excess of the appropriate number of days of hospitalization and claimed insurance money such as