(b) Injury resulting from special obstruction;

2. (a) A. B. Determination

변호사 주광기(피고인 정##을 위하여)

다만, 피고인 정00에 대하여는 이 판결 확정일부터 2년간 위 형의 집행을 유예한다. 압수된 부엌칼 1자루(증 제1호)를 피고인 정00으로부터, 손도끼 1자루(증 제2호)를 피고인 정##으로부터 각 몰수한다.

1. Defendant 100

피고인은 2012. 4. 9. 15:00경 대전 동구 대동에 있는 상호를 알 수 없는 식당에서 동생인 피해자 정##(36세)과 술을 마시던 중, 어머니에 대한 부양 문제로 말다툼을 하다가 피해자에게 충고를 하였는데도 오히려 피해자가 “기분 나쁘다.”며 주먹으로 피고인의 얼굴을 3회 때리자 화가 나, 같은 날 19:18경 대전 중구 부사동에 있는 '일등주유 소’ 앞길에서 위험한 물건인 부엌칼(칼날 길이 18㎝, 손잡이 12㎝)을 들고 피해자에게 “죽여버리겠다.”며 위협을 가하고, 위 부엌칼을 휘둘러 피해자를 협박하였다.

2. 피고인 정 ##

(a) Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a)

On April 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 19:18, in front of the “Japanese Oil Station” in the Jung-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon; (b) on the same way as above, the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife against the victim; and (c) knife knife knife knife (30cm in length, 8cm in length in length) of the Defendant’s vehicle parked in front of the “Japanese Oil Station”, and threatened the victim with the above knife knife.

(b) Injury resulting from special obstruction;

On April 9, 2012, the Defendant issued several notifications to the Defendant that “I am son, I am knife, I am knife and knife I am knife I am knife I am and knife I am knife I am knife I am knife I am and knife I am knife I am, and I am am knife I am knife I am knife I ambling I am at the front of the Knifenife, I am amnife I amnife I am and knife I am and knife I am in order to arrest the Defendant's hand knife I am on the front of the Knife I amnife I am.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. The protocol of each police statement about Ansan**

1. Records of seizure and photographs of each police;

1. A damaged site and a photo;

1. A medical certificate or an injury medical certificate;

Application of Statutes

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant 100: Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act

나. 피고인 정## : 폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률 제3조 제1항, 제2조 제1항 제1호, 형법 제283조 제1항(협박의 점), 각 형법 제144조 제2항 전문, 제1항, 제136조 제1항(특수공무집행방해치상의 점)

1. Commercial competition;

피고인 정## : 형법 제40조, 제50조(각 특수공무집행방해치상죄 상호간 범정이 더 무거운 피해자 안00에 대한 특수공무집행방해치상죄에 정한 형으로 처벌)

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

피고인 정## : 형법 제37조 전단, 제38조 제1항 제2호, 제50조(형이 더 무거운 특수공무집행방해치상죄에 정한 형에 경합범가중)

1. Discretionary mitigation;

Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Code (The following consideration shall be taken into account in favor of the reasons for sentencing)

1. Confiscation;

The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Code

1. The scope of punishment;

가.피고인 정00: 징역 6월 ~ 15년 나.피고인 정##: 징역 1년 6월 ~ 22년 6월

2. 양형기준의 적용(피고인 정##에 한함)

[Determination of Punishment] Crimes of Obstruction of Official Duties, Death or injury caused by Special Obstruction of Public Duties

[Special Aggravations] - Aggravations: Where there are many public officials who have suffered damage;

[Determination of Recommendation Area] Aggravation

[Recommendation Scope of Punishment] Three to Six years (before mediation according to the applicable sentences of law)

[Disposition of Multiple Crimes] Since the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) for which the sentencing criteria are not set and the crime of violation under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act are concurrent crimes, the lower limit is based on the lower limit of the scope of sentence according to the sentencing criteria for the crime of injury

2. Determination of sentence;

A. Defendant 100

○ 피해자인 정##이 처벌을 원하지 않고 있는 점

○ The fact that all of the crimes of this case are recognized and his mistake is divided.

나. 피고인 정##1)

[Unfavorable Circumstances] The maintenance of order in the law and the public peace of the point where a police officer in charge of crime prevention and suppression commits an assault and assault and inflicted an injury in need of medical treatment for four weeks and ten days.

○ An offense of obstruction of performance of official duties has been committed even though there was a history of punishment.

[유리한 정상] 협박 피해자인 정##이 피고인의 처벌을 원하지 않고 있는 점

○ Deposit of 3 million won and 1 million won for each victim’s injury resulting from special obstruction of performance of official duties*

○ The fact that all of the crimes of this case are recognized and his mistake is divided.

Judges Jeon Jinio

Judges Secretary-General;