권리범위확인(상)
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
(a) Registration number (1) / filing date / registration date / registration date / renewal date of the registered trademark of this case: For the trademark registration C/D/ E//S on September 17, 2012: the agricultural product-type (3) the product category category - the agricultural product category 5 of the product category - the rice of Category 29 of the classification of the product category - the bed, dney, ludne, melted rice of Category 30 of the classification of the product category - rice of Category 31 of the product category - rice feed of Category 31 of the classification of the product category, agricultural products seeds
(b) The composition of a trademark subject to verification (1): (2) The products of use: The method of using rice (3) shall be marked with a sign on the package; and
다. 이 사건 심결의 경위 (1) 피고는 2019. 2. 14. 원고를 상대로 “확인대상상표 및 이 사건 등록상표에 공통된 ‘메뚜기米’ 또는 ‘메뚜기’는 쌀 상품에 관하여 관용하는 표장이거나 상품의 품질을 보통으로 사용하는 방법으로 표시한 표장에 해당할 뿐만 아니라 요부가 될 수 없으므로 양 상표는 서로 유사하지 않아 확인대상표장은 이 사건 등록상표의 권리범위에 속하지 않는다.”고 주장하면서 특허심판원에 소극적 권리범위확인심판을 청구하였다.
(2) After examining the Defendant’s request for a trial as 2019Da520, the Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered the instant trial ruling citing the Defendant’s request for a trial on April 8, 2020, on the following grounds: “The part of “the joint trademark” cannot be an essential part, and the trademark subject to confirmation does not fall within the scope of the right of the instant registered trademark because it does not correspond from the registered trademark of this case’s appearance, name, and concept.”
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Summary of the parties' arguments;
A. The plaintiff's "main rice" is not a commonly used trademark for rice, and since the main part of the registered trademark of this case and the trademark subject to confirmation are common to "main", both trademarks are similar, and products using the trademark subject to confirmation are designated goods of the registered trademark of this case.
The trademark subject to confirmation is the case.