beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.06.22 2017나100541

구상금

Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding thereto shall be dismissed;

2...

Reasons

Basic Facts

The relevant Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to AMW car (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with B cab (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”).

Around 1:40 on January 28, 2016, the Plaintiff’s vehicle that occurred in the instant accident was driven along three lanes near the D hotel located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon.

On the other hand, E driving of the Defendant is stopping at the fourth-lane of the crosswalk near the D hotel at the time, and the part stoppinged by E was a yellow stop line indicating the bus exclusive lane.

Plaintiff

The vehicle is running along the three-lanes, while driving along the three-lanes, in order to turn on the direction direction, etc. to the right side of the vehicle, and to pass ahead of the unclaimed vehicle in a state that does not completely deviate from the three-lane, the vehicle is driving along the two-lanes along the two-lane and the two-lanes.

At the time when the irregular vehicle has almost completed the change of the lane into a four-lane, the Defendant vehicle that gets passengers from the four-lane to the three-lane prior to the irregular vehicle began to enter the three-lane while trying to change the lane from the four-lane to the three-lane prior to the irregular vehicle. The Plaintiff’s vehicle that found the two-lane vehicle turns into the two-lane to the two-lane to avoid the collision with the Defendant vehicle, and rapid stop across the two-lane and the three-lane to the two-lane.

At the time of that moment, the F Tracin, who had driven two lanes at the time of that moment (hereinafter referred to as the “instant cracin”), did not avoid the Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped in front, and had the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle shocked to the right side of the instant cracin’s front side.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). On the other hand, the instant 4-distance crossing signal, etc. immediately preceding the instant accident, was a straight line, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle was an irregular vehicle.