손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant paid KRW 7,898,056 to the Plaintiff KRW 5% per annum from October 13, 2017 to November 21, 2017.
1.The following facts of recognition may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the statements or images of Gap evidence 1 to 6, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the commission to the appraiser C by the appraiser C of this Court, and the purport of the entire pleadings.
The plaintiff is the owner of 1 Dong-dong 102, Daegu-gu Down-gu, and the defendant is the owner of 202 Dong-dong 202, who resides therein.
B. However, in the case of the Defendant’s dwelling, the main stream of the Plaintiff’s dwelling was contaminated, and the Defendant’s dwelling was corrosioned.
In addition, after the removal of bathing rooms in the Defendant’s dwelling, water flows into the Plaintiff’s residence toilet site and the corrosion and pollution of the tent occurred.
In addition, water leakages generated from a boiler room distribution valve in the defendant's residence flows into the entire floor of the defendant's residence through the gap of floor heating pipes and slopings, and the plaintiff's tent timber was cut through the floor concrete, and the plaintiff's fungs, fungs, and walls were polluted by fungs, fungs, and walls, and the fungs were partly generated from the external wall.
C. As a result, the Plaintiff needs to replace the string of the strings, the storage room, and the distribution place, the entire tent and the ceiling, and to remove the external wall instead of the external wall.
The cost of remuneration and construction required by the plaintiff shall be as follows:
Items Nos. 1,218,6582 wall pollution 141,4433 Tystrugy Cystrugy 28,157 61,306 (an appropriate amount out of the plaintiff's initial construction amount) 6 living room remuneration of 6 living room 927,476 (an appropriate amount out of the plaintiff's initial construction amount) 7 outside0 17,711,105,950 won applied 44.801/268 of the plaintiff's co-ownership of 44.801/268 (other than this, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit) in total (the plaintiff's assertion is without merit) 7,180.