When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of B 110cc.

At around 18:35 on October 14, 2014, the Defendant driven the above Oralba, and led to the intersection of the luminous distance in front of the Madra in the Madon-dong, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Suyang-si to the scarfri, from the 14th place on the port-do 14 complex.

At this time, the crosswalks with signal lights and vehicle signal lights are installed, so in such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on the way by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle, and to prevent the accident by safely driving according to the signals such as signal,

Nevertheless, when the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to follow the signal, the Defendant received the victim C (9 years of age) who opened the crosswalk to port from the right side of the direction to the port of the direction of the road according to the signal of the marin pedestrian.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered damages to the victim’s diversity which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to traffic accident reports and diagnosis reports;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of the instant traffic accident for the instant sentencing order under Article 334(1) is as follows: (a) the victim who dried the crosswalk was injured; (b) the Defendant subscribed to a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance; and (c) the victim’s injury caused by the instant traffic accident appears not to be much weighted; (d) the Defendant was an initial offender who has no record of criminal punishment; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship,