Before the witness of the defense counsel filed a request for auction against the apartment of the defendant (C), the defendant asked the victim (D) that "the driver will not enter an auction", and the victim (D) asked the question that "I will not have any fested that "I will not do so if I will do so at the auction, I will have any fry.", and the victim (D) asked "I would like to have fested about the part of the plaintiff.", and further asked the victim (D) to answer the question that "I will not pay the remainder of the money if I would know that I would have known that I would have fested the members of the plaintiff," and the victim (D) called "I will not do so."

However, the fact that D, around December 2009, there was no statement that the Defendant made to the Defendant, “A shall not be paid the remainder of the money if C knows that the members are all aware of the guidance and the telephone of the guidance members,” and “C shall not be paid any other money,” before the Defendant applied for an auction to the apartment of C.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion was that the Defendant testified as stated in the facts charged in the court of Chuncheon District Court No. 217 on July 13, 2012, but this is consistent with objective facts and does not constitute a statement contrary to the Defendant’s memory.

3. Determination

A. First, prior to filing a request for auction of the apartment of the Defendant (C), the witness stated that the victim (D) “I will also enter an auction” and that the victim (D will not pass the auction if I will enter an auction).