However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. From February 18, 2017 to the same year upon C’s request by the Defendant for fraud at the construction site of B detached Housing.

3. By the end of 29.2, the work, including the establishment of access roads to detached houses B located in the former west-gun.

On February 18, 2017, the Defendant was at the construction site of the detached Housing B located in North Korea-gun, and the Defendant paid the victim D the amount after the completion of the construction work on the site of housing construction.

“.......”

However, even if the defendant receives the above construction cost of a detached house, he thought that he will use it individually, such as living expenses, and there was no intention or ability to pay the victims with the absence of any specific property.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) had the victim engaged in the work to adjust the site of the said detached house for two days from February 18, 2017 to September 19 of the same month, the Defendant did not pay the said price; and (c) thereafter, he did not pay the construction price equivalent to KRW 4210,000 in total four times as shown in attached Table 1, as in attached Table 1.

2. The following year is re-subcontracted from G awarded a subcontract for civil engineering works involving multi-household E in all North Korea-gun E to the same year from April 11, 2017. < Amended by Act No. 14873, Apr. 11, 2017>

6. From the 25th day of the construction site of the Newly constructed multi-household housing, civil engineering projects were conducted together.

On April 16, 2017, the Defendant, at the site of civil works in the above multi-household unit, would pay the victim H the amount after the completion of the construction work for the appurtenant civil works.

“.......”

However, even if the defendant receives the construction price of the above multi-household, he thought that it was used individually, such as living expenses, and because there is no particular property, he shall pay the victim the working price.