A. The defendant is an organization established to prevent hazards caused by elevators through an inspection, etc. of elevators and to systematically promote elevator safety management business, etc., as prescribed by the Elevator Facilities Safety Management Act. The plaintiffs are general employees or contractual workers who belong to the defendant.

(The present class shall be as shown in Appendix 2. (b).

The defendant divided the class of workers in general service and contract workers who are full-time workers, and had the employees under his jurisdiction take charge of the elevator inspection, etc.

These contract workers in general service have different types of remuneration payment.

For example, the ordinary wage, which is the basis for calculation of overtime work allowance, is based on the amount including basic pay, qualification allowance, and long-term continuous service allowance in general service, while in case of contractual service, only the basic wage was the ordinary wage.

On the other hand, for contract-based workers, items such as salary paid to general service workers, namely, vehicle subsidy (payment of KRW 70,000 per month until December 201, and KRW 110,00 per month from January 201), handphone subsidy (payment of KRW 40,00 per month until December 201), regular bonus (payment of KRW 600 per month basic salary in cases of contract-based workers) and performance bonus (payment of KRW 600 per month after monthly equal division), performance bonus (payment according to the corresponding grade A through D), performance bonus other than incentives, transportation subsidy, heavy food expenses, work allowance, additional charges, and continuous service additional charges were additionally paid.

C. The contents of the main provisions that form the payment standards for each of the above benefits to the employees belonging to the defendant are as shown in the attached Table 3.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 7, 9 (including branch numbers for those with branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. Prior to the Plaintiffs’ alleged vehicle subsidies, the aforementioned costs are included.