공직선거법위반등
As to the crime No. 1 and No. 2 in the judgment of the defendant, a fine of one million won shall be imposed on the crime No. 3 in the judgment.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who serves as the Secretary General in D, who is a medical care protection facility for senior citizens in Daejeon-gu Daejeon.
While the Defendant kept 45 senior citizens who were unable to express their intent in the above “D” or suffering from dementia, the Defendant arbitrarily prepared an absentee report on the 18th presidential election in the name of the above 45 senior citizens, and submitted it to the competent community service center for reported absentees.
1. On November 2012, the Defendant: (a) instructed a senior citizen E, an administrative assistant, to prepare an absentee report in the name of the senior citizen receiving medical care in a lump sum.
Accordingly, around November 23, 2012, the above E entered “G” in the address column of the site for reported absentees, “F” in the name of the householder, “G” in the name column, “G” in the name column, “G” in the name column, “H” in the name column, “G” in the name column, “G” in the name column, “G” in the name column, and “G” in the name of the absentee report cause, and “G” and “G” in the name of the reporter column, respectively, and affixed the G seal kept by the Defendant to the above name.
In addition, for the purpose of exercising as described in the attached list of crimes, the Defendant forged 45 copies of reported absentees, including the above G, etc., which are private documents related to the certification of facts without authority.
2. On November 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) held that the above E was submitted to the public officials in charge of the above community service center as if the 45 copies of the forged reported absentees’ report were duly formed at the Daejeon-dong Community Service Center located in Jung-gu, Daejeon; and (b) held that the above E was submitted en bloc to the public officials in charge of the above community service center.
3. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant violated the Public Official Election Act did not receive consent from 45 persons such as the above G, etc. for reported absentees, the above E, as in the preceding paragraph, shall be reported as having the intention of reported absentees such as the above G.