Where the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won shall be one day.

1. On January 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 08:14, 2018, at the D main points managed by the Victim C (40 tax) located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan (40) around 08:14, the Defendant was bread by drinking alcohol, and was boomed for the reason that his/her employees are influent and service is bad, and was added to his/her hand.

In the end, the Defendant damaged the customer of the main shop managed by the injured party to the repair cost of KRW 100,000.

2. The defendant who has interfered with his duties shall cut away from the date, time, and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph, for the same reason, and shall take the spawn's disease contained in the spawn.

The victim's main business was obstructed by force by avoiding the disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as cutting off the string and displaying the door by cutting the string to the bottom.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of destroying property), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for negligence;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

3. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

4. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment.