2. It is recognized that the Defendant is both aware of and against his mistake, and that the Defendant complained of physical symptoms, such as shocking difficulties and uneasiness, etc., due to alcohol abuse from June 2, 2011.

However, on the other hand, the defendant, on the ground that the 119 emergency squad called out, did not arrive at the scene, took a bath to three damaged fire-fighters, asked their arms, etc., and inflicted bodily injury on the victim, and damaged the public goods by breaking the electric microphone installed inside the ambulances, which was installed in the ambulances, and then, was arrested in the act of committing the crime and the progress of the crime.

In addition, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is a crime that undermines the function of the State by nullifying the exercise of legitimate public authority and thus requires strict punishment. In particular, in this case, many injured public officials are imposed, and the defendant has been subject to eight times or more in the past, and the same type of crime of this case, such as assault, bodily injury, and the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, which are punished as the crime of this case. There is no special change in circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, and there is no change in the criminal punishment and equity with regard to other crimes similar to each of the crimes of this case. In full view of all the circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments such as the defendant's age, character, character, occupation and environment, occupation and environment, family relationship, each of the crimes

3. Conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.