On March 18, 2017, around 01:08, the Defendant passed a road front of the Daegu-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu C lending (hereinafter referred to as “the Defendant”) with a view to gathering money and valuables from the injured party and using them as a livelihood cost by reducing the money and valuables from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant followed the victim, and found that he left the door, which he saw on the so-called arm's length, and his woman "Wookbb kyb wum."

The name of "" was laid down on the floor of the kicker, knicker, knicker, knife the female's face, knife the female's face, knife the female's body at several times, and knife the female's body at several times, but knife the female's right hand, and knife the female's right hand, so knife the female's right hand, etc., even if knife the female's body, and knife the female's body.

As a result, the Defendant: (a) led the victim to suppress the victim’s resistance; (b) led the victim to force the victim to leave the bank owned by the victim; (c) failed to achieve that intent; and (d) led the victim to the attempted crime; and (c) caused the victim’s salt, tensions, and tensions that require approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. A medical certificate or an examination and treatment set;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph Defendant at the scene of crime;

1. Relevant Article 337 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 337 of the choice of punishment;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's defense counsel's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for the mitigation of small amount (the following circumstances of sentencing) of the Act on the Punishment of Small Amount, and Article 55 (1) 3 of the same Act

The argument is asserted.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, although the defendant was found to have drank at the time of the instant crime, it was found that the defendant had a weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to the circumstances before and after the instant crime, in light of the circumstances and the circumstance before and after the instant crime.

shall not be appointed by a person.

Accordingly, the defendant and the defendant.