If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On May 2, 2013, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of B1 ton cargo vehicles, driven the above vehicle on May 22, 2013, and proceeded at a speed of about 50K km at a speed of about 50 K km in the speed of the Sinhyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.

Since there is a signal signal, a person engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to drive according to the signal.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and found the DM3 car volume driven by the victim C (at 39 years old) who had left to the left in accordance with the new code on the surface of the new line in the boat park by negligence in violation of the signal, and operated a brake, but did not reach this, and there was a collision between the left part of the damaged vehicle and the front part of the driver's seat.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence on the part of the above business, the fluoral finites in need of treatment for about three weeks, from the victim E (n.e., 13 years of age) on board the damaged vehicle, the injury to the brain-dead sugar requiring medical treatment for about three weeks, and from the victim F. (11 years of age), multiple finites in need of medical treatment for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report and each medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;