A. Although the defendant misunderstanding the facts did not assault the victim or injure the victim as stated in the facts charged, the court below convicted all of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (an amount of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실 오인 주장에 관하여 원심에서 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들을 종합하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지, “ 피고인이 2014. 8. 25. 경 스텐인 레스 비이커를 피해 자의 가슴 부위 쪽으로 던졌고, 2014. 8. 27. 경 피고인의 주먹으로 피해자의 머리, 가슴, 목 부분을 수회 때리고, 손으로 피해자의 목덜미를 잡아 바닥에 넘어지게 하였으며, 그 곳 책상 위에 있던 송곳으로 피해자를 찌르려는 시늉을 하는 등의 폭행으로 피해자에게 상해를 가하였다” 는 취지로 진술하고 있는 바 그 진술이 구체적이고 대체로 일관되며 당시 D에 근무하던

The statement of H and G also coincide with this, and ② On August 27, 2014, the victim was diagnosed by the hospital “14 days of treatment,” the body part of the injury as stated in the above diagnosis document, the body and degree of the injury correspond to the above statement of the victim, ③ the sound of the recording file CD submitted by the victim suffers from metal and immediately thereafter, the victim’s sound is recorded. In full view of the following: (a) on the day of August 27, 2014, the victim took a diagnosis of “14 days of treatment,” the victim assaulted the victim and inflicted an injury on the victim.” (b) The victim may recognize the fact that the victim inflicted an injury on the victim.

Therefore, the decision of the court below that found each of the facts charged of this case guilty is just, and there are errors.