1. At around 00:53, July 4, 2020, the Defendant discovered that, at the front parking lot of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment-dong, the doors of the victim B (the age of 48) parked therein were not corrected, and opened the above car door and opened the inside, one of the 130,000 AF tobacco amounting to KRW 1,00,000 at the market price being kept inside the inside.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. At around 01:30 on July 4, 2020, the Defendant continued to commit larceny against the victim E, the victim E (the age 42), who was parked in the front parking lot of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul apartment Fdong, discovered that the text of the franchise is not corrected, and opened a door of the said vehicle and opened it, and examined the inside of the said vehicle for the purpose of stealing money and valuables, but did not search for the stolen objects.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to steal the victim's property and attempted to commit it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement G, B and E;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 329 of the Criminal Act that choose a punishment, Article 342 of the Criminal Act, Article 342 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. From among concurrent offenders, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, the Defendant committed the instant crime even after being sentenced to a fine of five times for the same crime since 2013, a stay of execution two times, and a sentence one time for the same crime. On April 24, 2020, the Defendant committed the instant crime even after being sentenced to a fine for the same offense under several Acts.

Many of the theft crimes committed by the Defendant are "vehicle hair" and interviews with the criminal law and appearance, and in this case, it is not good to commit such crimes as having a number of times a vehicle that has not been tightly connected with a parking lot in an apartment complex because it returned to the new wall for a long time.

Notwithstanding the repeated punishment of the defendant, the same method of punishment shall be applied.