상표법위반등
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below [one year of imprisonment (three years of suspended execution) and 120 hours community service work for Defendant L, and fine of four million won for Defendant L] is too unreasonable.
2. There is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court on the grounds that new materials for sentencing have not been submitted in the trial, and in full view of the factors revealed in the arguments in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing was too too excessive and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.
It does not appear.
3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.