For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted the Defendant of each violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act among the charges charged against the Defendant.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, but did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of violating the Occupational Safety and Health Act and safety measures, or by misapprehending the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.