beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.07.31 2014고합115

아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, each of the above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive is against the Defendants.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On April 24, 2014, Defendant A sent a conversation with the Victim H (A, 12 years of age) indicating himself/herself as 18 years of age through the “G” of smartphone hosting display.

On April 24, 2014, the Defendant decided to give 150,000 won to the victim and 150,000 won to sexual intercourse, and entered J 207, in 1,00 in 1,00 in 1,00, 150 won to the victim and 150,000 won to the victim.

As a result, the Defendant committed the act of purchasing sex of a child or juvenile victim.

2. On April 25, 2014, Defendant B provided a conversation with the victim who indicated himself/herself as 18 years of age through the “G” of smartphone hosting display.

On April 25, 2014, the Defendant decided to give 100,000 won to the victim and to sexual intercourse, and then entered the above J 218 to give 10,000 won to the victim and sexual intercourse once with the victim.

As a result, the Defendant committed the act of purchasing sex of a child or juvenile victim.

Summary of Evidence

The Defendant’s crime of this case, on which each order to disclose the main text of Article 21(2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, is not a sex offense against a child or juvenile, and the crime of this case, which is subject to an order to notify under Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, is subject to an order of suspension of execution under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 (hereinafter the following grounds for sentencing) of the Criminal Act, of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, under which each order to attend each of the grounds for sentencing has not been issued, under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.

The defendants are first offenders with no criminal power and reflect their mistakes in depth, and there are various circumstances that are viewed as the reasons for sentencing as follows, and they should not disclose personal information.