However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 9, 2017, at around 2:50, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the victim D (son, 47 years of age) who was the Defendant’s wife in his own residential area located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, did not go through a speech with him; and (b) threatened the victims by threateninging them with the victim E (son, 24 years of age) who is his/her father, who was his/her his/her father, and coming out of the country, and was a dangerous object in the country where he/she left the country (23 cm in total length, 9 cm in length of the day).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession and reflect, there is no punishment for the same kind of crime, nor more than a fine, and the victims who are family members are not punished by the defendant).