However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who drives a rocketing car.

On January 16, 2013, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of 0.091% of alcohol concentration of 0.55%, and continued to drive the said vehicle at a speed of 0.01% on the right-hand side of the victim C(W 30 years old) driving, which was straight ahead of the center line due to the occupational negligence near the center line, while driving the said vehicle at a speed of at a speed of 1-lane, the Defendant continued to gather the said part before the left-hand side of the said car of the victim E(28 years old) driving in accordance with the said SM 3 car, and followed the said part into the left-hand side of the said passenger vehicle of the victim E(20 minutes old).

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as cerebral alky in detail, requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and suffered injury to the victim I (40 years of age), the victim E, the passenger of the said SM3 car, the victim J (24 years of age), the passenger of the said SPtra, and the victim G, respectively, for approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police protocol of statement of C, E, and G;

1. A written statement of I and J;

1. The actual survey report (1, 2);

1. Statement of employer-employed drivers, and statement of employer-employed drivers;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of a sound driving) concerning criminal facts;

1. It is decided in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code.