beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고단1435

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A’s violation of the restriction on vehicle operation on March 1, 2002, which is an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, on March 1, 2002. 2. The punishment provisions applicable to a summary order subject to review on the roads in front of the old business office of the Korea Highway Corporation (the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24, October 29, 201; 2010Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010, Supreme Court Decision 2008Hun-Ga17, July 30, 2009) retroactively loses its effect pursuant to the decision of unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Court (the Constitutional Court Decision 201Hun-Ga38, Oct. 29, 2010; 2008Hun-Ga17,