2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On December 9, 1987, the Plaintiff was a person who was enrolled in the Central High-Speed Daegu Office Co., Ltd. and was engaged in C business. On November 20, 1991, the Plaintiff was determined by applying for medical treatment and applying for medical treatment. The Plaintiff was determined as follows: (a) on November 20, 191, when entering the Central High-Speed Office Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul High-speed Office”); and (b) on the diagnosis of the “Weatum salt”, the “4-5 Tinches, and the 5th century-1,000 forecast signboards escape certificate” (the foregoing diseases were referred to as the “formerly approved disease”).

B. Since the Plaintiff applied for the first medical care due to an injury or disease on November 21, 1991, the Plaintiff closed the treatment on May 30, 2005, and received disability benefits after receiving the diagnosis under class 8 subparag. 2 of the disability grade. However, on or after June 2008, the Plaintiff filed an application for the additional medical care and filed an application for the re-treatment, and was subject to converging of converging signboards, inverte, spine, and invertebregy, at the hospital. The subsequent application for additional injury or disease was rendered a non-approval decision as follows.

- On November 21, 1991, 191, approval for the escape from the first place of medical care for the first time on December 11, 1991, 191, - the approval for the escape from the conical signboards between the 4-5 drilling and 1,000. - the re-treatment approval on May 30, 2005 - April 22, 2008 - the re-treatment approval on November 30, 2009 - the re-treatment approval on July 7, 201 - October 18, 201, Nov. 14, 201, 201; the non-approval for the re-treatment operation (L4-5-S1) and the re-treatment approval on May 30, 2009 - the re-treatment approval on November 30, 2013; the non-approval on the re-treatment operation on November 14, 2011>

C. On November 8, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury and additional medical care with the Defendant on the ground that “malary disorder” was an injury and injury to the Defendant on November 8, 2010, but was subject to a disposition of non-approval by the Defendant on November 20, 2010. However, on May 20, 2015, the Plaintiff’s transfer of movable property at the Mung University Hospital under the below.