A and C Imprisonment for 8 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for 8 months, 3,000,000 won, and Defendant D’s fine for 3,00,000 won.

Defendant

B On June 29, 2017, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) and decided on October 27, 2017.

1. The Defendants jointly committed the crimes of Defendants A and C [Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (Offense of Arranging Sexual Traffic, etc.)] decided to operate a business with the trade name “H” on the 5th floor of the petition-gu Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, to operate a business of arranging sexual traffic, and Defendant A conspired to take charge of the management of business place, settlement of profits, etc. as the owner of business, and the management of female employees, customer guidance, and daily settlement of accounts.

From September 10, 2016 to December 20, 2016, the Defendants provided three rooms in which sexual traffic is conducted at the above location, eight massage rooms, one employee waiting room, etc., and hired a female employee of a non-state of the birth country, such as I “I” and “J” to have sexual intercourse with male customers, and received 110,000 to 130,000 won in return for customers, and arranged sexual traffic with female employees who are employed at the above establishment, by providing them with facilities such as three rooms in which they are engaged in sexual traffic, and by providing them with sexual traffic with KRW 50,00 per single female employees.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act by a defendant A shall employ any person not eligible for sojourn;

Nevertheless, on September 21, 2016, the Defendant employed a female K (K and one-day “L”) with the nationality of Thailand (K and one-day “L”) who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities at the above business establishment, as an employee on the condition that the Defendant would pay KRW 1.5 million per month.

As a result, the defendant employed a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

3. Defendant C

(a) A defendant who violates the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as brokerage of sexual traffic;